#03 Count variables normalization

Normalization Rules · Impact measurement

Bafuliiru-led · Kifuliiru language · We develop and use this Kifuliiru formula at Kifuliiru Lab—our platform, our work for Kifuliiru

Explanation

For discrete counts (words, recordings, sentences): ratio to target, capped at 1 so over-documentation does not inflate the score.

Data & measurement

v_i counts Kifuliiru material (words, recordings, annotated sentences). v_i^target is the policy goal for that Kifuliiru variable. The min(·,1) cap prevents over-achievement from inflating LIS when a Kifuliiru corpus already exceeds targets. Targets should be revised rarely and with migration notes.

Solution & proof

For v_i ≥ 0 and v_i^target > 0, the ratio v_i/v_i^target is nonnegative for Kifuliiru documentation metrics. Taking min(1, ·) yields a value in [0,1]. If v_i ≥ v_i^target, norm_i = 1; otherwise norm_i is the linear fraction of progress toward the Kifuliiru target—standard capped ratio normalization.

Examples

  1. 1. Lemma count below target

    Word problem

    The Kifuliiru documentation goal for lemmas is 1,000. The team has 400 validated Kifuliiru entries. What is norm_i?

    Kifuliiru count normalization

    Value
    Documented lemmas v_i400
    Target v_i^target1000

    Solution

    Step 1 — Compute the ratio v_i / v_i^target = 400/1000 = 0.4 for the Kifuliiru lemma count.

    Step 2 — Since 0.4 < 1, min(1, 0.4) = 0.4. So norm_i = 0.4.

  2. 2. At and above target

    Word problem

    When v_i = 1,000 exactly, what is norm_i? When v_i = 1,500, what is norm_i?

    Same target, different counts

    v_iv_i / targetnorm_i
    10001.0min(1,1)=1
    15001.5min(1,1.5)=1

    Solution

    Step 1 — At the Kifuliiru target, the ratio is 1, so norm_i = 1.

    Step 2 — Above the target, the ratio exceeds 1 but the cap forces norm_i = 1 so extra Kifuliiru documentation does not increase the score.

Source

Impact measurement framework — Normalization Rules

Tags

impact-measurementcount-0-1